|
Face-Negotiation Theory is a theory first proposed by Stella Ting-Toomey in 1985 to understand how different cultures throughout the world respond to conflict. The theory posits “face”, or self-image, as a universal phenomenon that pervades across cultures. In conflicts, one’s face is threatened; and thus the person tends to save or restore his or her face. This set of communicative behaviors, according to the theory, is called “facework” . Since people frame the situated meaning of “face” and enact “facework” differently from one culture to the next, the theory poses a cultural-general framework to examine facework negotiation. ==Background== Face-Negotiation Theory is primarily based on the research of Stella Ting-Toomey, a professor of Human Communication Studies at California State University, Fullerton. In this theory, “face” is a metaphor for self-image, which originates from two Chinese conceptualizations: lien and mien-tzu. Lien is the internal moral face that involves shame, integrity, debasement, and honor issues. Mien-tzu, on the other hand, is the external social face that involves social recognition, position, authority, influence and power.〔Hu, 1944〕 Erving Goffman situated "face" in contemporary Western research.〔Goffman, 1967〕 He noted that face is a concern for one’s projected image that is both immediate and spontaneous and is tied to the dynamics of social interaction.〔Rogan & Hammer, 1994〕 Correspondingly, "facework” denotes actions taken to maintain consistency between the self and public line. Further research by Penelope Brown and Stephen Levinson on politeness suggests that the desire for face is a universal concern.〔Brown & Levinson, 1978〕〔West, Turner & Zhao, 2010〕 Ting-Toomey expands this thinking and conceptualizes face as an individual’s claimed sense of favorable social self-image in a relational and network context. Facework is defined as clusters of communicative behaviors that are used to enact self-face and to uphold, challenge/threaten, or support the other person’s face.〔 With these concepts and frameworks, Face-Negotiation Theory investigates intercultural conflict styles. The perceived or actual conflict differences revolve around three issues: content, relational, and identity.〔Wilmot & Hocker, 1998〕 Content conflict refers to the substantive issues external to the individual involved. Relational conflict refers to how individuals define, or would like to define, the particular relationship in that particular conflict episode. Identity-based conflict concerns issues of issues of identity confirmation-rejection, respect-disrespect, and approval-disapproval. In this way, identity issues are tided closely to culture-based face-orientation factors. A face-threatening episode is an identity expectancy violation episode. Thus, the Face-Negotiation Theory views conflict, intercultural conflict in particular, as a situation that demands active facework management from the two interdependent conflict parties. The theory has gone through multiple iterations since its creation. There is a 1988 version of seven assumptions and 12 propositions,〔 a 1998 version of seven assumptions and 32 propositions,〔 and most recent the 2005 version of seven assumptions and 24 propositions.〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Face negotiation theory」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|